Evils Issue in David Hume's Thought, Theological Responses to It

Share this post :

The study of the research critically examines the philosophical issue of evil, tracing its intellectual evolution from David Hume’s empirical approach to the ontological solutions offered by the School of transcendental wisdom in Islamic thought.

 The research argues that prominent Western theodicies, such as Alvin Plantinga’s "Defense of Free Will" and John Hick’s "Soul-Making Theodicy," despite their attempts to defend belief in Allah against Hume’s skeptical challenges, remain largely confined to the cognitive framework established by Enlightenment philosophy. 

In contrast, Islamic thought, particularly through the lens of the transcendental wisdom school, as expressed by figures like Mulla Sadra, Martyr Murtada Mutahhari, and Allameh Tabatabai, does not merely defend faith, but offers a fundamental shift in intellectual paradigms. 

By introducing the principle of "the primacy of existence," defining evil as "non-being" or an incidental result of a fundamentally good system, and re-conceptualizing suffering within a teleological framework aimed at spiritual perfection, this school seeks to address the problem of evil at its core. The study argues that the apparent contradiction between an all-goodness God and the existence of evil is not an inherent feature of reality, but rather the result of flawed metaphysical and ontological assumptions grounded in a purely empirical worldview.

Comments


Related topics

الخميس 05 تشرين الثاني 2026
الخميس 05 تشرين الثاني 2026
الخميس 05 تشرين الثاني 2026
Open Access Statement
This is an open-access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
All articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Under this license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their content, but allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy the content as long as the original authors and source are cited.
messages.copyright © 2023,