Between Anthony Flew's Non-religiosity, Nicholas Wright's Religiousness

Share this post :

The great importance given to the issue of revelation and general prophecy, and its repercussions on thought and behavior

in addition to the problems directed by non-religious people to this doctrine, prompted us to address them, through analysis and criticism of the proposal presented by Anthony Flew as a skeptic of revelation. Because the religion that Flew discussed is Christianity, we had the opportunity to investigate its most important doctrines and discuss them on a rational and historical bases.This research briefly studies the evidence established by Anthony Flew, professor of philosophy at Oxford University, and Nicholas Wright, the Bishop of Durham, and investigated the doctrines they arrived at. The first was a representative of the “non-religious” and the second was a representative of the church. The research concludes the necessity of revelation and prophecies, and questioned some of the basic doctrines of the Christian religion.

Comments


Related topics

الخميس 05 تشرين الثاني 2026
الخميس 05 تشرين الثاني 2026
الخميس 05 تشرين الثاني 2026
Open Access Statement
This is an open-access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
All articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Under this license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their content, but allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy the content as long as the original authors and source are cited.
messages.copyright © 2023,