Ethical Pragmatism

Share this post :

This research demonstrates how American modernity, since the Declaration of Independence from Britain, sought to compensate for its lack of a civilizational heritage, in contrast to other societies.

 It adopted scientific rationalism and intellectual superiority as measures for the development of its people, as well as a symbol of their rise. Furthermore, it insisted on the adoption of pragmatic utilitarianism, sometimes influenced by British utilitarian philosophy, and at other times in its distorted form, as its proponents preferred to call it. The American philosopher John Dewey proposed a reformist pragmatism, rejecting foreign elements like individualism and narrow utilitarianism, as well as the idea that "the ends justify the means." Dewey aimed to present a pragmatism that differed from its predecessors in the breadth of its utilitarian values and its narrow framework, seeking to expand its scope to include society as a whole, viewing it as a progressive value striving for the common good. He placed democracy above all else, fearing the rise of fascism and Stalinism, which were re-emerging in Europe on the eve of the World Wars. 

It also reveals how these reforms failed to withstand the ambitions of successive U.S. administrations. Moreover, Dewey’s pragmatism contained inherent limitations and contradictions from its inception. Over the following decades, utilitarian values became increasingly dominant, with contemporary American thinkers acknowledging a deep chasm between the power of the United States and the legitimate demands of its citizens for basic human rights.

Comments


Related topics

الخميس 05 تشرين الثاني 2026
الخميس 05 تشرين الثاني 2026
الخميس 05 تشرين الثاني 2026
الخميس 05 تشرين الثاني 2026
Open Access Statement
This is an open-access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
All articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Under this license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their content, but allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy the content as long as the original authors and source are cited.
messages.copyright © 2023,