Between Anthony Flew's Non-religiosity, Nicholas Wright's Religiousness

Share the post :

The great importance given to the issue of revelation and general prophecy, and its repercussions on thought and behavior

in addition to the problems directed by non-religious people to this doctrine, prompted us to address them, through analysis and criticism of the proposal presented by Anthony Flew as a skeptic of revelation. Because the religion that Flew discussed is Christianity, we had the opportunity to investigate its most important doctrines and discuss them on a rational and historical bases.This research briefly studies the evidence established by Anthony Flew, professor of philosophy at Oxford University, and Nicholas Wright, the Bishop of Durham, and investigated the doctrines they arrived at. The first was a representative of the “non-religious” and the second was a representative of the church. The research concludes the necessity of revelation and prophecies, and questioned some of the basic doctrines of the Christian religion.

addcomment


related

Monday 12 February 2024
Eitiqad magazine, for theological studies and philosophy of religion, is a peer-reviewed quarterly magazine, issued by the “Baratha Center for Studies and Research” in Beirut and Bagdad. It is concerned with studies related to theology, beliefs, and philosophy of religion. It aims to implement criticism in issues related to these fields, and to establish them from a rational and Islamic standpoint.
All rights are saveed © 2023,